Home » Blue Angels Schedule » The Blue Angel F/A-18 Hornets Are Literally Falling Apart In Mid-Air
Blue Angels Schedule

The Blue Angel F/A-18 Hornets Are Literally Falling Apart In Mid-Air

It’s
no secret that the Navy and U.S. Marine Corps’ fleet of ‘legacy’
Hornets have literally had their wings flown off them. Many of the
aircraft are far beyond their design life, and depots can’t work fast
enough at refurbishing them in hopes of getting more use out of them.
As a
result, some squadron flight lines look more like junkyards due to
ongoing cannibalization for parts, and low availability rates plague the
fleet.
Even the Navy and Marine Corps Flight Demonstration Team, the Blue Angels, are not immune to this ‘Hornet rot’ epidemic. 
Just last weekend at the Rockford Airfest in Illinois, Blue Angel #5,
one of the act’s lead hard turning, fast flying solo jets, lost the
outboard leading edge maneuvering slat on its left wing during the
demonstration. Quite literally, the whole flight control section appears
to have broken away. You can see a picture of it here from our friends at Airshowstuff.com.  
The jet
landed safely, and the pilot took the spare aircraft and rejoined the
demonstration just minutes after the event occurred. But still,
somewhere out there is a big, blade-like piece of blue Hornet laying on a
rooftop or on the ground. And it could have been worse.
Much worse.
Just a week
before the Rockford incident occurred, another one of the Blue Angel’s
Hornets had shed a piece in flight while maneuvering over Rochester, New
York. This time it was from one of the jet’s right wings, and it was found by a local fisherman floating in a marsh.
The issue of old, worn-out legacy Hornets has been exacerbated by a number of factors. The
delays in the F-35 program have resulted in a need to structurally
upgrade the Navy’s existing fighter fleet, with some F/A-18A/B/C/Ds
going from a 6,000 hour lifespan to 10,000 hours or more. This will put the type in service till 2035, much longer than ever anticipated.
Additionally,
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have built up many more hours than
were planned over the last decade or so, and a ‘fighter gap’ caused by
all this continues to loom, although it has been slowly closed by small
lots of additional Super Hornet purchases by the Navy alone. The USMC is
another story, as they never purchased the Super Hornet, and instead
put all their chips on the F-35, a move that has leeched dollars meant
for upgrades out of existing platforms.
On top of
all that, there’s also now a workforce gap of about 10 percent in
trained aircraft artisans and engineers needed to keep the Hornet fleet
in the air. And just to add a little dash of political ruin to
everything, sequestration made it tougher for the services to buy spare
parts for aircraft.
Meaning good jets were kept out of the air because a simple component was simply not available for replacement.
The truth
is that this whole legacy Hornet debacle is as much a symptom of a
largely reactive Navy and Marine Corps than a proactive one, when it
comes to fleet management and coming up with real-world contingencies to
foreseeable problems. Those two main problems being massive delays in
the F-35 program and defense cuts via sequestration or otherwise.
Readiness and things like spare parts seem to take a backseat or
procurement of new gold-plated weapon systems. The F-35 program in
particular has instilled total fear in those involved that if planned
production numbers get cut, even my a small margin, the whole program
will enter a catastrophic death spiral. These claims remain highly
debatable.
There is
also the issue of putting many hours on the Navy’s fast jet force for
missions that could have been more cheaply and efficiently accomplished
by fighter aircraft (or not fighters at all but light air support aircraft)
based in country in Afghanistan. Many Navy fighter airframe hours were
burned making the long transit from the Arabian Gulf to Afghanistan over
the last decade and a half, even years after the initial invasion of
that country was complete. The Navy would like you to believe their
fleet issues were the victim of mission tasking, but in reality, the
whole system was flawed, with U.S. forces using fuel hungry tactical
fighters and even strategic bombers, many flown over thousands of miles,
for a job that would have been better served by a fleet of commercially
available turboprop light attack aircraft and fighter aircraft based in
country alone.
Regardless of the services nearsightedness on the matter, throngs of
legacy Hornets cannot fly forever, and it appears that their age is
showing in the most visible place possible, the United States Navy and
Marine Corps Flight Demonstration Team. Although flying without key
control surfaces is an awesome trick, it is not part of a safe show and
quite honestly, we owe our people in the cockpit more than geriatric
jets that regularly shed parts in flight.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: